In the vast world of medicine, where knowledge and technology advance rapidly, a glaring blind spot remains: the care of older adults. Despite elders comprising a significant portion of hospitalized patients, medical education and practice often fail to meet their unique needs.
Medical curricula traditionally define the 'normal' patient as a 70 kg healthy young adult male. This narrow standard sidelines the realities of aging, leaving future physicians ill-equipped to diagnose and treat complex elder conditions. Geriatrics, the medical specialty focused on aging, is frequently marginalized or offered as a brief elective rather than a core component of training.
Consequently, older patients face risks such as polypharmacy—the use of multiple medications that increase the chance of harmful interactions and side effects. Standard treatment protocols, developed based on younger populations, may prove inappropriate or dangerous when applied to elders without adjustment for altered physiology and comorbidities.
These systemic issues are compounded by societal ageism, which infiltrates medical culture and influences how providers perceive and prioritize elder patients. Time constraints, fragmented care, and lack of interdisciplinary collaboration further exacerbate the problem.
However, there is hope. Some practitioners advocate for holistic, patient-centered approaches that incorporate functional assessments, patient goals, and social contexts. Innovations in medical education aim to integrate geriatrics throughout training, emphasizing empathy and comprehensive care.
Addressing these gaps is not merely a medical imperative but a societal one, as populations age globally. Improving elder care requires rethinking education, policy, and practice to ensure dignity, safety, and quality of life for older adults.
These insights align with analyses from medical education research, gerontology experts, and critiques of healthcare systems worldwide. 1 2 4
Want to explore more insights from this book?
Read the full book summary