The Science of Prediction: How Measuring and Scoring Forecasts Changes Everything

Imagine trying to improve at a skill without any feedback. You wouldn’t know what works or what to fix. Forecasting is no different. Without precise measurement, it remains guesswork. The revolution in prediction accuracy began when researchers insisted on clear, testable forecasts and rigorous scoring.

Ambiguity is the enemy of accountability. A forecast like "The economy will improve soon" is untestable. What does "soon" mean? What counts as "improve"? To learn, forecasts must have explicit timelines and measurable criteria.

The Brier score is a powerful tool for quantifying forecast accuracy. It measures the squared difference between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes. A perfect forecast scores zero; random guessing scores 0.5. This metric rewards both calibration—how well probabilities align with real-world frequencies—and resolution—the ability to distinguish between events that happen and those that don’t.

Calibration is especially important. If you say an event has a 70% chance, it should happen about 70% of the time. This alignment builds trust and signals true skill.

Another key insight is the need for many forecasts. Individual predictions are noisy; only by aggregating large samples can we reliably assess skill and improve methods.

By embracing measurement and scoring, forecasting transforms from art to science. It enables forecasters to learn from errors, refine techniques, and steadily enhance accuracy.

Sources: HowDo Summary, SoBrief Summary, Slate Star Codex Review