Inside the Legal Battles That Exposed the Sackler Family’s Role in the Opioid Crisis

As the opioid epidemic escalated into a national crisis, legal actions against Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family intensified. Unlike typical corporate litigation, these lawsuits named individual family members personally, a rare and significant move signaling heightened scrutiny and accountability.

Mary Jo White, a former U.S. Attorney known for handling complex, high-profile cases, led the Sacklers’ legal defense. Her strategy framed the epidemic as multifactorial, attempting to deflect blame from Purdue and the family. However, depositions and leaked documents revealed contradictions between the company’s public statements and internal knowledge about addiction risks.

The legal saga included state and municipal governments seeking billions in settlements, while advocacy groups pushed for transparency and justice. Despite multi-billion-dollar settlements, many argue these penalties fall short of addressing the crisis’s human toll.

This blog draws from "Empire of Pain" and recent legal news to provide insight into the challenges of litigating against powerful families and corporations. It highlights the tension between legal defense, public outrage, and the quest for accountability in one of America’s deadliest public health disasters.

Understanding these legal battles is essential for grasping the broader societal implications of the opioid crisis and the ongoing efforts to prevent future tragedies.

Sources: NPR’s analysis of the Sackler lawsuits, The New York Times legal coverage, and official court documents.
1 , 3